Mastering Training Needs Analysis & Training Evaluation is a practical fast-track training seminar that provides the latest philosophies, met, ods and tools to be able to complete the two most important areas of training – Training Needs Analysis (TNA) and Evaluation. It will also show those attending how to demonstrate the added value of training activities.
In today’s difficult financial climate, these are the two areas that will really make a difference to any training function.
In this training seminar, participants will:
Find out about the New Process for doing TNA
Know How to become more precise with TNA
Master Competency Frame Works
Learn about the New Evaluation Model
Be able to Prioritise Training, Show Training Costs and Calculate ROI
You might be interested in another Learning and Development programs as a next step.
YOU WILL LEARN HOW TO
By the end of this training seminar participants will be able to:
Identify and be able to use the 4-level model for doing Training Needs Analysis
Have practiced the techniques in a practical and understandable way
Master how competencies are constructed and know which ones are the best to harness to get good results
Use the new priority process to be able to prioritize all training requests in a logical way that is easy to understand
Master training evaluation using the 10-step model
Know which training is suitable for evaluation and which ones are not
Practice evaluating a series of training courses
IMPORTANT COURSE INFORMATION
Participants who fully attend this course and complete the test on the last day will receive a Strategic Axis Professional Certificate (SAPC). SAPC certificates are regionally recognized and can be quite valuable when applying for more senior roles within the organization or outside.
COURSE OUTLINE
Introduction
Alternative Options to TNA
The Four-Quadrant Model of TNA – a New Way of Analysis
Use of a Training Schema to establish the complete training process and set the rules
Who is the Customer?
Quadrant One: Use of a Simple Coding System to Code the Different Types of Training
Corporate needs into Action – How much of the process is governed by TNA?
Introduction
Alternative Options to TNA
The Four-Quadrant Model of TNA – a New Way of Analysis
Use of a Training Schema to establish the complete training process and set the rules
Who is the Customer?
Quadrant One: Use of a Simple Coding System to Code the Different Types of Training
Corporate needs into Action – How much of the process is governed by TNA?
Module 2: Quadrant Two: Department Needs & Quadrant Three: Team Needs
Quadrant Two: Departments
The Specific Requirement Departments Have – relationship with yearly operating plans
The speed of Action from Identification to Action – On-going Monitoring – What is needed? Specific Analysis Tools
Creating Self-Empowered teams
Departments – Your Most Challenging Customer
Quadrant Three: TNA for groups – What are their individual needs?
Use of the Adair model to aid TNA
Module 3: Quadrant Four: Individual Needs Dealing with Priorities and Training Unit Costs
Quadrant Four: Individual needs
Ways to Train other than Attending a Training Course
How to Prioritise and the Quick System?
Understanding and Mastering Training – unique competencies
New Software Advances to Simplify and Reduce TNA error
Understanding Unit Costs and Budgets for Training – Essential for TNA and Evaluation
Module 4: Mastering the Evaluation Process
Validation vs. Evaluation – What is the difference?
Current Models Explained: Kirkpatrick, CIRO, IES and the 10-Step Process
Understanding the Process of Evaluation and its position in the Training Cycle Schema
How to Use the 10-Step Process to Produce Training Evaluation – each step explained
The Evaluation Formula
How do you decide what Training Needs in Evaluating? – use of the priority model
All Four Quadrants Reviewed
Module 5: Practical Examples of Evaluation – Your Chance to Master the Techniques
Accountability of Training Department to Guarantee and Produce Results
Why some people can’t learn? – fact, not fiction
Should all training be subject to Evaluation?
Back-at-Work Presentations
